previous up next print clean
Next: Gazdag migration from an Up: LEAST-SQUARES IMAGING Previous: Kirchhoff migration in constant

Gazdag migration in v(z)

Gazdag modeling and migration is not a unitary operator for depth-variable velocity. As a result, we lose steep dip components of the image after migration. The least-squares imaging method can be used instead to recover the high dip components. Now the operator in equation (2) becomes the Gazdag modeling operator. Figure [*](a) shows the velocity function used in the experiment, and the image in the model has the same syncline reflector as Figure [*](a). The result of the forward Gazdag modeling is shown in Figure [*](b). The image obtained by the migration of this data is shown in Figure [*](c) and we can see that the steep dip components is weakly imaged in comparison to the original model. The image obtained by the least-squares imaging of the same data, shown in Figure [*](d), shows more steep dip energy.

 
Gazmiginv
Gazmiginv
Figure 6
Least-squares Gazdag imaging: (a) The velocity model for the syncline reflector shown in Figure [*](a), (b) Gazdag modeling, (c) The image obtained by the Gazdag migration for (b), (d) The image obtained by the least-squares Gazdag imaging for (b) (after 10 iterations).
view


previous up next print clean
Next: Gazdag migration from an Up: LEAST-SQUARES IMAGING Previous: Kirchhoff migration in constant
Stanford Exploration Project
11/17/1997