next up previous [pdf]

Next: Acknowledgments Up: Shan and Biondi: Angle Previous: Numerical examples

Conclusions

Conventional horizontal angle domain CIGs are not useful for steeply dipping reflectors because of the offset stretch. Reverse-time migration provides robust angle domain CIGs for both steep and near-flat reflectors by merging horizontal and vertical CIGs. Plane-wave migration in tilted coordinates can also provide reliable CIGs because the propagation direction is closer to extrapolation direction and the subsurface offset direction is closer to the dip direction in tilted coordinates. For both methods, angle domain CIGs of a image point should be viewed in the direction normal to its dip direction. For the BP velocity benchmark dataset with unrealistically large offsets, comparisons show that reverse-time migration has better large angle energy, otherwise the angle domain CIGs from these two methods are comparable. When the velocity is not correct, the CIGs from both migration methods provide useful moveout information.


next up previous [pdf]

Next: Acknowledgments Up: Shan and Biondi: Angle Previous: Numerical examples

2007-09-18