Angle domain common image gathers for steep reflectors |
Both shot-profile and source-receiver migrations can generate subsurface offset domain CIGs
that are equivalent to each other (Shan and Zhang, 2003). In shot-profile migration,
the source wavefield
and receiver wavefield
are
extrapolated into all depths, where is the source location, is the horizontal location, is the vertical location,
and is the angular frequency.
Offset domain CIGs are formed by cross-correlating the source
and receiver wavefields with a horizontal shift as follows (Rickett and Sava, 2002):
For near-flat reflectors, angle domain CIGs obtained by downward continuation migration using equations 1 and 2 are reliable. However, there are two issues in downward continuation migration that impose difficulty in obtaining reliable CIGs of steeply dipping reflectors. First, steeply dipping reflectors are mainly illuminated by high angle and overturned waves, but these waves cannot be modeled accurately by downward continuation migration. Second, because of the stretch of the horizontal subsurface offset at steeply dipping reflectors, we cannot obtain reliable angle domain CIGs from horizontal offset domain CIGs. Given an opening angle, the steeper the reflector is, the larger the horizontal subsurface offset is needed to get a reliable angle domain CIG. However, the length of the subsurface offset is limited in shot-profile migration to save the cost. Therefore, we cannot get useful angle domain CIGs of steep reflectors from horizontal offset domain CIGs.
In the next two sections, we discuss how the two issues in downward continuation migration are solved by reverse-time migration and plane-wave migration in tilted coordinates.
Angle domain common image gathers for steep reflectors |