Next: Common-Azimuth Migration
Up: Preprocessing
Previous: Data infill
The regular cube was then datumed to just
above the water-bottom to avoid spending migration time on
downward continuation through the water layer. Figure 13
shows a comparison of one CMP 3D gather before (left) and after
datuming (right). Notice
that datuming not only saves propagation time but also allows a significant reduction of
the data to be migrated because the offsets decrease as the recording surface is ``moved''
closer to the reflectors, making the positions of sources and receivers closer.
Notice also that the holes in both offsets and CMPs have been healed by the
propagation.
|
---|
datum-comp
Figure 13. Before-after datuming comparison. Panels (a) and (c)
correspond to the inline CMP section at CMP-Y=-12.5 m, 150 m inline offset and -25 m
crossline offset, before and after datuming, respectively. Panels (b) and (d) correspond
to the inline offset gather at CMP-X=8550 m, CMP-Y=-12.5 m and -25 crossline offset,
before and after datuming, respectively. Notice that the datuming, besides shifting the
data upwards, also healed the holes in the acquisition and reduced the offset coverage.
|
---|
|
---|
Next: Common-Azimuth Migration
Up: Preprocessing
Previous: Data infill
2007-10-24