next up previous print clean
Next: Comments and conclusions Up: Noise separation in field Previous: Data residuals

Noise subtraction

Figures [*] through [*] show the efficacy of this simple signal to noise subtraction algorithm facilitated by the combined modeling operator inversion scheme presented here. Only the LRT model-space is forward modeled back into the data-space for subtraction from the original data. In every case the least-squares approach produces the best signal enhancement. Gather 14 produces a lot of acausal noise that could be muted, though the direct arival was the main target for this gather. That being the case, it could also be considered a poor result.

The sparesness oriented schemes produce gathers with little to no improvement in signal-to-noise ratio while altering the amplitude variation, and sometimes kinematics, of the gathers.

 
s.08
s.08
Figure 10
Signal estimate for shot-gather 08 (Panel (a) from Figure [*]). Panel (b) shows the BC, Panel (c) the Cauchy, Panel (d) the l1, and Panel (d) the l2 inversion results.
view burn build edit restore

 
s.14
s.14
Figure 11
Signal estimate for shot-gather 14 (Panel (b) from Figure [*]). Panel (b) shows the BC, Panel (c) the Cauchy, Panel (d) the l1, and Panel (d) the l2 inversion results.
view burn build edit restore

 
s.25r
s.25r
Figure 12
Signal estimate for shot-gather 25 (Panel (c) from Figure [*]). Panel (b) shows the BC, Panel (c) the Cauchy, Panel (d) the l1, and Panel (d) the l2 inversion results.
view burn build edit restore


next up previous print clean
Next: Comments and conclusions Up: Noise separation in field Previous: Data residuals
Stanford Exploration Project
5/3/2005