next up previous print clean
Next: Conclusion Up: Guitton: High resolution Radon Previous: Estimating sparse radon domains

Examples

Figure [*]a shows a synthetic CMP gather with five hyperbolas. First, the model is constrained to have positive values in Figure [*]b. Note that this domain is artifacts free and extremely focused. Second, the model is constrained to have negative values in Figure [*]c. Again, the model is very sparse. Finally, the sparse model obtained by adding Figures [*]b and [*]c is shown in Figure [*]d. As expected, this model is very sparse compared to the radon panel obtained without sparseness constraints in Figure [*]e. Now, this method is tested on one CMP gather from a marine dataset in the Gulf of Mexico. Here, the proposed method is also compared with the sparse result with the Cauchy regularization Sacchi and Ulrych (1995). Figure [*]a shows the input data. The sparse models obtained by adding the bounded models and by using the Cauchy regularization are shown in Figures [*]d and [*]e, respectively. Both results are almost identical, with the new technique yielding a better panel. The residual, i.e., the difference between the input data and the remodeled data, is also very similar in both cases (Figures [*]b and [*]c).
next up previous print clean
Next: Conclusion Up: Guitton: High resolution Radon Previous: Estimating sparse radon domains
Stanford Exploration Project
5/3/2005