next up previous print clean
Next: Discussion Up: Results Previous: Devil's Advocate: What do

A Real Data Example

I test the proposed algorithm on a single CMP gather from the Mobil AVO dataset, described above. The results are shown in Figure [*]. Relative to the results seen on the Haskell synthetic, they are fairly poor. On the bright side, notice decent preservation of signal amplitude. The earliest water-bottom multiples are suppressed quite effectively, although the later reverberations are left almost untouched.

The reasons for the less-than-perfect are likely numerous. First, and most important, the multiple reflections quickly become incoherent with an increasing number of bounces. They match well with the primaries only for the strongest reflections. I estimated a relatively small water-bottom reflection coefficient, 0.1, so the multiples are relatively weak in amplitude. I did not perform any preprocessing on the data, and I believe they were donated to SEP as raw gathers. () applied cable balancing to the Mobil AVO dataset. High-wavenumber, offset-variant amplitude variations along events spoil the ability regularization equation ([*]) to discriminate against crosstalk.

 
cmps.lsrow.haskreal
cmps.lsrow.haskreal
Figure 7
Application of equation ([*]) to CMP from Mobil AVO data. Top row, left to right: Raw CMP gather, NMO applied; Estimated primary panel; difference panel.


view burn build edit restore


next up previous print clean
Next: Discussion Up: Results Previous: Devil's Advocate: What do
Stanford Exploration Project
6/7/2002