Next: BACKGROUND
Up: Prucha and Biondi: STANFORD
Previous: Curry: : REFERENCESMulti-scale PEFs
Data interpolation can be cast as in inverse problem,
where the known data remains constant, and the empty bins are
regularized to constrain the null space. A two-stage linear approach
was developed () where a prediction-error filter (PEF) is estimated
on known data, and is then used to constrain the unknown data by
minimizing the output of the model after convolution with the PEF.
When the data is not stationary, a non-stationary filter has been used
to fill the unknown data (). This gives better
results than a patching approach, where the data is broken up into
separate patches that are assumed to be stationary, largely because
most data is smoothly non-stationary. In the case of sparsely (but
regularly) sampled data, the non-stationary filter can be stretched over various scales to fit the data.
Most recently, a PEF was estimated on irregularly sampled data by
scaling the data to various grid sizes and simultaneously estimating a
single filter on the various scales of data in a multi-scale approach ().
Here, I take the multi-scale approach for irregular data, and extend it
to estimate a non-stationary PEF. I examine how to choose the parameters needed for this
non-stationary PEF estimation, namely micro-patch size, scale choice,
regularization, and filter size, and how they are related when using
this estimation method. I use this approach to
interpolate a poorly sampled 2D test case, where existing methods
would fail, with promising results. I then interpolate a suitable 3D
test case with very promising results, with the eventual goal of
seismic data interpolation.
Next: BACKGROUND
Up: Prucha and Biondi: STANFORD
Previous: Curry: : REFERENCESMulti-scale PEFs
Stanford Exploration Project
6/7/2002