Next: Event Identification
Up: Brown et al.: Converted
Previous: Data Background
We use a 2-D Extended Split-Step prestack depth migration algorithm Stoffa et al. (1990) with three
so-called ``reference velocities'' to handle lateral velocity variation. Image sampling in
depth is 16 meters, which is probably a bit coarse for the regions of the image above the
basalt, but adequate for sub-basalt imaging.
The migration algorithm outputs angle domain common image gathers (ADCIG) for velocity analysis.
in fact, the ``angle'' axis here is parameterized in terms of offset ray parameter, ph, which
is linked to reflection opening angle by the following relationship Prucha et al. (1999).
| |
(1) |
is the reflector dip angle, and is the interval velocity in the neighborhood
above the reflector point.
Sava and Fomel (2000) show an efficient method for direct computation
of ADCIGs as a function of opening angle. In both cases, the ADCIGs are easier to interpret for
angle-dependent phenomena than are offset-domain common image gathers, a fact that we feel will improve
our ability to identify converted waves in the presence of complex multiples and refracted waves.
We summarize some important parameters for the migration below:
- Input data CMP spacing: binned to 25 m (from nominal of 12.5 m).
- Image CMP sampling: 1024 samples @ 25 m (26 km total).
- Image Depth sampling: 325 samples @ 16 m (5.2 km total).
- Frequencies imaged: 3-34 Hz.
- ADCIG sampling: 120 samples @ sec/m.
Next: Event Identification
Up: Brown et al.: Converted
Previous: Data Background
Stanford Exploration Project
9/18/2001