...attributes.
Without such, only four points are seen on the plane.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...perpendicular
I really think it would be without the bandpass issues
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...selected.
This method is not salt-proof. Like so many other things salt really screws up things. All analysis here-in has windowed out the region of the salt body.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...value.
While these well behaved model amplitudes are picked by peak amplitude, the author will freely rant upon request about the importance of using some product of amplitude and thickness of wavelet when analysing real data.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...plot,
It is unclear whether simple regression on this plane could result in incorrect unit vectors without the dismissal of anomalous points by an interpreter. What is encouraging is that in the test thus far, these calculations are very insensitive to the precision of the $\theta$.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Stanford Exploration Project
9/18/2001