next up previous print clean
Next: Conclusions Up: Helical factorization of paraxial Previous: Polynomial division

Synthetic examples

Figure [*] shows a slice through the broad-band impulse response of the 45$^\circ$ equation. As with the 2-D 45$^\circ$ equation, evanescent energy at high dip appears as noise, and takes the form of a cardioid. This is never a problem on field data, and has been removed from the depth-slices shown in Figures [*] and [*].

Figure [*] compares the impulse responses of the 45$^\circ$ equation obtained with the x-y splitting approximation [panel (a)] and the helical factorization methodology described in this chapter [panel (b)]. Implicit migration with the full Laplacian, instead of a splitting approximation, produces an impulse response that is azimuthally isotropic without the need for any phase corrections.

Figure [*] shows the effects of the different boundary conditions on the two spatial axes. The fast spatial axis (top and bottom of Figure) have helical boundary conditions, and show wrap-around. The slow spatial axis (left and right of Figure) has a zero-value boundary condition, and hence is reflective.

For the examples in this chapter, we set the `one-sixth' parameter Claerbout (1985), $\beta_{1/6}=0.125$, and used the isotropic nine-point Laplacian from equation ([*]) that corresponds to $\gamma = 2/3$ in equation ([*]).

 
3Dcardioid
3Dcardioid
Figure 1
Vertical slice through broad-band impulse response of 45$^\circ$ wave equation, showing the distinctive cardioid.
view burn build edit restore

 
3Dtimeslice
3Dtimeslice
Figure 2
Depth-slice of centered impulse response corresponding to a dip of 50$^\circ$. Panel (a) shows the result of employing an x-y splitting approximation, and panel (b) shows the result of the helical factorization. Note the azimuthally isotropic nature of panel (b). Evanescent energy has been removed by dip-filtering prior to migration.
[*] view burn build edit restore

 
3Dboundary
Figure 3
Depth-slice of offset impulse response corresponding to a dip of 45$^\circ$. Note the helical boundary conditions on the fast spatial axis.
3Dboundary
view burn build edit restore


next up previous print clean
Next: Conclusions Up: Helical factorization of paraxial Previous: Polynomial division
Stanford Exploration Project
5/27/2001