For completeness, I conclude this section with two simple examples of forward interpolation in seismic data processing. Figure shows a 3-D impulse response of Stolt migration Stolt (1978), computed by using 2-point linear interpolation and 8-point B-spline interpolation. As noted by Ronen (1982) and Harlan (1982), inaccurate interpolation may lead to spurious artifact events in Stolt-migrated images. Indeed, we see several artifacts in the image with linear interpolation (the left plots in Figure ). The artifacts are removed if we use a more accurate interpolation method (the right plots in Figure ).

Figure 27

Another simple example is the radial trace transform Ottolini (1982). Figure shows a land shot gather contaminated by nearly radial ground-roll. As discussed by Claerbout (1983), Henley (1999, 2000), and Brown and Claerbout (2000a,b), one can effectively eliminate ground-roll noise by applying a radial trace transform followed by high-pass filtering and the inverse radial transform. Figure shows the result of the forward radial transform of the shot gather in Figure in the radial band of the ground-roll noise and the transform error after we go back to the original domain. Comparing the results of using linear and third-order B-spline interpolation, we see once again that the transform artifacts are removed with a more accurate interpolation scheme.

radialdat
Ground-roll-contaminated shot
gather used in a radial transform test
Figure 28 |

Figure 29

12/28/2000