. 5 98 . . x . . 100 7The question for the interpreter is, what should be the value of

This example charmed me enough to remember it for 25 years
and to relay it to you now,
with the hope that we can do something helpful about Busch's problem
(that mathematical contouring is not as good as common sense).
The solutions that we are most accustomed to are
the linear solutions that come from minimizing quadratic forms.
Such setups generally give the average value of `x` near 54
that Busch would like to avoid.

We might wonder if Busch's problem is too hard for any mathematical method. I think we would feel that progress had been made, however, if we uncovered a method that told us this data

. 98 . 5 . x . . 100 7suggests a river while this data

. 5 . 98 . x . . 100 7suggests a ridge. The whole problem could be more interesting in the presence of more data values. The more remote data values could actually be making the choice of a river channel or a ridge.

The goal is that the result should look more like topography
than what we see arising from familiar *L _{2}* methods.
The essential aspect of real world topography
is that erosion cuts drainage channels.

4/27/2000