next up previous print clean
Next: Synthetic seismograms Up: Elastic Modeling Previous: Elastic Modeling

Models

The two 2-D synthetic datasets were computed assuming an earth model that includes Figure 1 shows the P-wave velocity for both models.

 
model
model
Figure 1
P-wave velocity models used to generate the synthetic data. Model 1 (top): overburden with flat layers, model 2 (bottom): overburden with velocity anomalies.
view burn build edit restore

In model 1, the overburden contains two flat layers with constant elastic properties on each layer, whereas model 2 includes a zone of complex velocity anomalies in the overburden. The rock properties for the model were taken from real well logs of a North Sea field. Typical values for different lithologies at this field are listed in Table 1.

1|c|Lithology 1|c|Vp (km/s) 1|c|Vs (km/s) 1|c|$\rho$ (g/cm3)
Shale 2.4 0.95 2.25
Cemented brine sands 3.1 1.55 2.15
Uncemented brine sands 2.6 1.3 2.1
Cemented oil sands 2.9 1.6 2.05
Uncemented oil sands 2.35 1.33 2
Volcanic ash (tuff) 2.75 1.23 2.2
Limestone 4 2 2.4
       

Table 1. Typical rock properties for different lithologies at the North Sea.

Average values for overburden properties in the field are Vp=2.2 km/s, Vs=0.75 km/s, $\rho=2.15$ (g/cm3).

In model 1, overburden properties above the flat interface were taken to be the average values indicated above; overburden properties below the interface were the average values with a $10 \%$ increase. For model 2, we introduced lateral velocity anomalies by including a smoothed sinusoidal interface between the two layers.


next up previous print clean
Next: Synthetic seismograms Up: Elastic Modeling Previous: Elastic Modeling
Stanford Exploration Project
4/28/2000